Why Classic Movies are AWESOME!

Classic movies interest me because I like how they acted back then. I like their mannerisms, how they dressed, how they talked, and the expressions they used. For example, "Oh, a wise guy, huh?" It made me wonder if they really said that in real life, or did they just use it in the movies. They didn't use a whole lot of special effects, they mostly relied on acting. In The Hunch Back of the Notre Dame (1939), the actor, Charles Laughton, had an excellent speaking voice, but he didn't use it much in the movie. He wanted to be known for his acting and not just for his speaking.

Another good movie that didn't use a whole lot of special effects but was a great film was The Haunting (1963). The movie didn't show ghosts, but you knew they were there. It was obvious there was a haunting because of all the noises, the camera angles, and the acting. There were other versions of The Haunting but they weren't as good as the original. Mostly, because they valued special effects over acting. In the original you imagined and wondered what the ghosts would look like and that's why it did so good. And that's why I love Tuner Classic Movies.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

BUNNY LAKE IS MISSING

                                           
 From the 1957 novel “Bunny Lake is Missing” this is the 1965 film about an American mother who had just moved to England with her brother and is now in a panic to find her missing four year old daughter Bunny. Whom, she claims to have dropped off on the first day of school, except there’s no sign of her anywhere. The teachers have no record of her; the children hadn’t seen or heard of her, and when they called for the police they didn’t even have a picture of her to show them.

Now a peculiar thing happens when the police arrive at the mother’s home. They weren’t able to find anything that belonged to the missing child. No toys, no books, and no clothes it didn’t even look like a child was there.

 Bunny’s mother was in a panic because now the police began to wonder if there was even a real missing child, and if there was who took her? Could it have been Wilson the eccentric landlord, whom seemed to have a thing for Bunny’s mother and isn’t too crazy about cops. Or could it have been one of the head mistresses of the school Bunny was supposedly to be at? An elderly retired woman living in a room above the school, who liked the children to come up and see her so she could ask them about their dreams and document them. Maybe it was the school’s cook, who said that she would watch the girl ten minutes before school started. But, then leave because of some criticism on her cooking. What about the brother? He seems to have an unusually close relationship with his sister, and he was the one willing to pay for an abortion to be done for his unmarried pregnant sister.  Or maybe Bunny really doesn’t exist? Bunny could have been imagined by the so called mother, who once (when she was child) had an imaginary friend named Bunny. So many possibilities but only one answer, what do you think happened?